[Day12] Read Rust Atomics and Locks - Lock Poisoning
by Mara Bos
At Topics: Chapter 1. Basics of Rust Concurrency
Notes
Lock Poisoning
A Mutex in Rust gets marked as poisoned when a thread panics while holding the lock. When that happens, the Mutex will no longer be locked, but calling its lock method will result in an Err
to indicate it has been poisoned.
Why we need to mark the mutex as poisoned?
If we do not do so, it may break assumptions made by other threads (Generate inconsistent state). By marking the mutex as poisoned, we can be forced to handle inconsistent state.
How it works?
Calling lock()
on a poisoned mutex still locks the mutex. The Err
returned by lock()
contains the MutexGuard
, allowing us to correct an inconsistent state if necessary.
Lifetime of the MutexGuard
- Lock and unlock the mutex in a single statement:
// it is Mutex<Vec<i32>> // You can lock the mutex, push an item into the Vec, and unlock the mutex again, in a single statement list.lock().unwrap().push(1);
- We should be careful of using mutex with
match
,if let
, orwhile let
. Look at the following example:
// Bad one if let Some(item) = list.lock().unwrap().pop() { process_item(item); // we still hold on to the lock unnecessarily } // The temporary guard will be dropped after here // Good one let item = list.lock().unwrap().pop(); // guard does get dropped here if let Some(item) = item { process_item(item); } // Similar one but is ok // A regular if statement is always a plain boolean, which cannot borrow anything if list.lock().unwrap().pop() == Some(1) { // guard does get dropped here do_something(); }